Hold Guns of Concept Analysis
Concept and Order of American Citizen
American teenager Kyle is clearly remembered by history. At the age of seventeen, he used a gun to defend his life, killed two people who attacked him and was acquitted by the court. As a result, those real Americans burst into tears, and those Democratic supporters are ashamed. The difference in conceptual order can be described as incompatible and completely opposite. The real difference between ideas is actually simple. The essence of this famous incident is still the Americans’ right to own guns, which the Democrats want to deprive and the patriots to defend. This is the fact.
A few years ago, in a scene in Las Vegas, a 66-year-old man shot dozens of shots at the bustling crowd in the stadium, hitting a Republican congressman in the butt, and several other people were also injured to varying degrees. . Americans shoot at people, and it happens every year. Someone rushed into the campus with a gun and swept wildly, killing dozens of students. This is the most explosive news in the United States. As for the assassination of politicians by gunmen, this is not the first time, nor the last. Kennedy and Reagan had been shot and assassinated before. Kennedy was killed as a result, and Reagan escaped.
So in the United States, the discussion about whether to control guns has been around for a long time. Republicans advocate that people continue to have gun rights, while Democrats have been trying to pass legislation to control guns. The two parties quarreled happily. Obama used his best efforts to this end, but in the end, he failed to achieve his goal. The Americans continued to have gun rights.
Why do Republicans defend citizens’ right to hold guns as they defend their lives? Here are some basic political concepts of American Republicans, which are mainly composed of three-dimensional conceptual order: The biggest perpetrator cannot be the people at any time, but the holder of public power; the purpose of the state is not to ensure the government and The interests of politicians are to ensure the interests of everyone; citizens’ right to own guns is the last minimalist way to ensure that everyone’s rights are not harmed.
People give up the best choice in any sense because this world of guilty people cannot have an optimal solution at any time and anywhere. People admit that gun rights will bring about a series of problems, but compared to those more serious problems, such as the abuse of public power by politicians, such as the government’s ultra vires to undermine citizens’ rights, the problems caused by gun rights are still tolerable, and they are Must be accepted.